Due by 11:59pm on Thursday, 7/7

Instructions

Download hw04.zip. Inside the archive, you will find a file called hw04.py, along with a copy of the OK autograder.

Submission: When you are done, submit with python3 ok --submit. You may submit more than once before the deadline; only the final submission will be scored. See Lab 0 for instructions on submitting assignments.

Using OK: If you have any questions about using OK, please refer to this guide.

Readings: You might find the following references useful:

Required Questions

Acknowledgements. This interval arithmetic example is based on a classic problem from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, Section 2.1.4.

Introduction. Alyssa P. Hacker is designing a system to help people solve engineering problems. One feature she wants to provide in her system is the ability to manipulate inexact quantities (such as measured parameters of physical devices) with known precision, so that when computations are done with such approximate quantities the results will be numbers of known precision.

Alyssa's idea is to implement interval arithmetic as a set of arithmetic operations for combining "intervals" (objects that represent the range of possible values of an inexact quantity). The result of adding, subracting, multiplying, or dividing two intervals is itself an interval, representing the range of the result.

Alyssa postulates the existence of an abstract object called an "interval" that has two endpoints: a lower bound and an upper bound. She also presumes that, given the endpoints of an interval, she can construct the interval using the data constructor interval. Using the constructor and selectors, she defines the following operations:

def str_interval(x):
"""Return a string representation of interval x."""
return '{0} to {1}'.format(lower_bound(x), upper_bound(x))

"""Return an interval that contains the sum of any value in interval x and
any value in interval y."""
lower = lower_bound(x) + lower_bound(y)
upper = upper_bound(x) + upper_bound(y)
return interval(lower, upper)

Question 1

Alyssa's program is incomplete because she has not specified the implementation of the interval abstraction. She has implemented the constructor for you; fill in the implementation of the selectors.

def interval(a, b):
"""Construct an interval from a to b."""
return [a, b]

def lower_bound(x):
"""Return the lower bound of interval x."""

def upper_bound(x):
"""Return the upper bound of interval x."""

Use OK to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q interval -u
python3 ok -q interval

Louis Reasoner has also provided an implementation of interval multiplication. Beware: there are some data abstraction violations, so help him fix his code before someone sets it on fire.

def mul_interval(x, y):
"""Return the interval that contains the product of any value in x and any
value in y."""
p1 = x * y
p2 = x * y
p3 = x * y
p4 = x * y
return [min(p1, p2, p3, p4), max(p1, p2, p3, p4)]

Use OK to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q mul_interval -u
python3 ok -q mul_interval

Question 2

Using reasoning analogous to Alyssa's, define a subtraction function for intervals. Try to reuse functions that have already been implemented.

def sub_interval(x, y):
"""Return the interval that contains the difference between any value in x
and any value in y."""

Use OK to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q sub_interval -u
python3 ok -q sub_interval

Question 3

Alyssa implements division below by multiplying by the reciprocal of y. Ben Bitdiddle, an expert systems programmer, looks over Alyssa's shoulder and comments that it is not clear what it means to divide by an interval that spans zero. Add an assert statement to Alyssa's code to ensure that no such interval is used as a divisor:

def div_interval(x, y):
"""Return the interval that contains the quotient of any value in x divided by
any value in y. Division is implemented as the multiplication of x by the
reciprocal of y."""
reciprocal_y = interval(1/upper_bound(y), 1/lower_bound(y))
return mul_interval(x, reciprocal_y)

Use OK to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q div_interval -u
python3 ok -q div_interval

Question 4

After considerable work, Alyssa P. Hacker delivers her finished system. Several years later, after she has forgotten all about it, she gets a frenzied call from an irate user, Lem E. Tweakit. It seems that Lem has noticed that the formula for parallel resistors can be written in two algebraically equivalent ways:

par1(r1, r2) = (r1 * r2) / (r1 + r2)

or

par2(r1, r2) = 1 / (1/r1 + 1/r2)

He has written the following two programs, each of which computes the parallel_resistors formula differently::

def par1(r1, r2):

def par2(r1, r2):
one = interval(1, 1)
rep_r1 = div_interval(one, r1)
rep_r2 = div_interval(one, r2)

Lem complains that Alyssa's program gives different answers for the two ways of computing. This is a serious complaint.

Demonstrate that Lem is right. Investigate the behavior of the system on a variety of arithmetic expressions. Make some intervals r1 and r2, and show that par1 and par2 can give different results.

def check_par():
"""Return two intervals that give different results for parallel resistors.

>>> r1, r2 = check_par()
>>> x = par1(r1, r2)
>>> y = par2(r1, r2)
>>> lower_bound(x) != lower_bound(y) or upper_bound(x) != upper_bound(y)
True
"""
r1 = interval(1, 1) # Replace this line!
r2 = interval(1, 1) # Replace this line!
return r1, r2

Use OK to test your code:

python3 ok -q check_par

Question 5

Eva Lu Ator, another user, has also noticed the different intervals computed by different but algebraically equivalent expressions. She says that the problem is multiple references to the same interval.

The Multiple References Problem: a formula to compute with intervals using Alyssa's system will produce tighter error bounds if it can be written in such a form that no variable that represents an uncertain number is repeated.

Thus, she says, par2 is a better program for parallel resistances than par1. Is she right? Why? Write a function that returns a string containing a written explanation of your answer:

def multiple_references_explanation():
return """The multiple reference problem..."""

Question 6

Write a function quadratic that returns the interval of all values f(t) such that t is in the argument interval x and f(t) is a quadratic function:

f(t) = a*t*t + b*t + c

Make sure that your implementation returns the smallest such interval, one that does not suffer from the multiple references problem.

Hint: the derivative f'(t) = 2*a*t + b, and so the extreme point of the quadratic is -b/(2*a):

"""Return the interval that is the range of the quadratic defined by
coefficients a, b, and c, for domain interval x.

>>> str_interval(quadratic(interval(0, 2), -2, 3, -1))
'-3 to 0.125'
>>> str_interval(quadratic(interval(1, 3), 2, -3, 1))
'0 to 10'
"""

Use OK to test your code:

Extra Questions

Extra questions are not worth extra credit and are entirely optional. They are designed to challenge you to think creatively!

Question 7

Write a function polynomial that takes an interval x and a list of coefficients c, and returns the interval containing all values of f(t) for t in interval x, where:

f(t) = c[k-1] * pow(t, k-1) + c[k-2] * pow(t, k-2) + ... + c * 1

Like quadratic, your polynomial function should return the smallest such interval, one that does not suffer from the multiple references problem.

Hint: You can approximate this result. Try using Newton's method.

def polynomial(x, c):
"""Return the interval that is the range of the polynomial defined by
coefficients c, for domain interval x.

>>> str_interval(polynomial(interval(0, 2), [-1, 3, -2]))
'-3 to 0.125'
>>> str_interval(polynomial(interval(1, 3), [1, -3, 2]))
'0 to 10'
>>> str_interval(polynomial(interval(0.5, 2.25), [10, 24, -6, -8, 3]))
'18.0 to 23.0'
"""